HIV Positive Man Turns HIV Negative- Investigation Under Process
It may sound unbelievable, but it’s true that the same Andrew Stimpson, 25 who was diagnosed as HIV-positive in the year 2002, was actually diagnosed as HIV-negative in October 2003 by Chelsea and Westminster Healthcare NHS Trust.The trust said that the tests were accurate; however the exact cure behind Stimpson’s cure could not be confirmed as he refused to undergo further tests.
“So far Mr Stimpson has declined this offer.”
A trust spokeswoman added: “We urge him, for the sake of himself and the HIV community, to come in and get tested.
“If he doesn’t feel that he can come to Chelsea and Westminster then he should please go to another HIV specialist.”
However at the end of it all, Scotsman Mr Stimpson said that he was “one of the luckiest people alive”.
Mr Stimpson, who is originally from Largs in Ayrshire, said: “There are 34.9 million people with HIV globally and I am just one person who managed to control it, to survive from it and to get rid of it from my body.
Mr Stimpson told the News of the World and Mail on Sunday that he became depressed and suicidal after finding out that he was HIV-positive but remained well and did not require medication.
Some 14 months later he was offered another test by doctors, which came back negative.
He sought compensation but has apparently been told there is no case to answer because there was no fault with the testing procedure.
He has told the papers he would do anything he could to help find a cure.
Deborah Jack, chief executive of the National Aids Trust, said: “This appears to be a highly unusual case and without further tests it is impossible to draw any conclusions for people living with HIV.
“The virus is extremely complex and there are many unknowns about how it operates and how people’s bodies react to it.
“Therefore, if this case were able to shed further light, it could be extremely valuable for research into treatments or a cure.”
Aids expert Dr Patrick Dixon, from international Aids group Acet said the case was “very, very unusual”.
“I’ve come across many anecdotal reports of this kind of thing happening in Africa, some quite recently, but it’s difficult to verify them,” he told BBC News 24.
“You have to be rock-solid sure that both samples came from the same person, no mix-up in the laboratory, no mistakes in the testing, etc.
“This is the first well-documented case.”
He said the case was important because “inside his immune system is perhaps a key that could allow us to develop some kind of vaccine”.
So all that’s in proceeding right now is the rigorous hardwork of the doctors to investigate Stimpson’s case and find out if there is indeed a bacterium to combat HIV.
Del.icio.us
Cosmos
Digg
November 16th, 2005 at 10:10 pm
If his body cured itself of HIV, I hope doctors can figure out how it was done as he has no idea. I am wondering if maybe his HIV testing results simply got mixed up at the lab or maybe a “false positive”? It’s happened before…
I hope he will agree to further tests to figure out how this happened, my son’s future (and millions of others, possibly a billion over the next 100 years) may just depend on a cure for HIV/AIDS as his mother and I have AIDS
If his body’s genetic material contains infomation that we could harness to fight HIV in others (or at least help with a vaccine), should he be forced to go through vigoruos testing? If he believes that he was cured of having HIV for real, why doesn’t he just say poke and prod me for awhile to see what you can find out? I would…
This could also be a hoax to somehow disprove that HIV/AIDS exists or is a health threat (there are many AIDS dissidents out there). Maybe a media stunt? I am just too damn cynical (tired of false hopes too)!